S
silverstorm2.19RPOriginal post
I've never been able to get why folks call methyltrienolone an "oral tren." I know its history and how it's related to trenbolone, but it's still a distinct steroid. After running it myself I can honestly say it shares more traits than differences with tren, yet it isn't the same. Below are the effects I noticed running the so-called "oral tren": 1. Huge potential for fat loss. This is where it really stands out. My waist kept shrinking while my total weight stayed the same. By two weeks it was obvious its fat-burning seemed to outpace tren. 2. It wasn't as fast-acting as I expected. I didn't see changes until around the two-week mark. Not ideal as a quick kickstart, in my view. 3. It complements a lean, hard look and boosted vascularity noticeably. I saw a clear change, though not as pronounced as tren for me. 4. I didn't feel much extra gym aggression, but people react differently. 5. Strength went up a bit, though I'm not a strength-focused trainee. I found myself doing more reps and extra exercises. 6. Bloodwork showed liver toxicity, which I expected, but at 500mcg my labs were similar to when I've run anadrol or superdrol. While I saw a lot of positive changes, I didn't notice real muscle gain. I suspect the oral form can't be dosed high enough to really produce…